Antsle Forum
Welcome to our Antsle community! This forum is to connect all Antsle users to post experiences, make user-generated content available for the entire community and more.
Please note: This forum is about discussing one specific issue at a time. No generalizations. No judgments. Please check the Forum Rules before posting. If you have specific questions about your Antsle and expect a response from our team directly, please continue to use the appropriate channels (email: [email protected]) so every inquiry is tracked.
Nano USB ethernet
ok im pulling my hair out... I hav a need to add a second NIC to my Nano... I love it it rocks.. but I dunno whats going on. Install theNIC.. rebooted (even rebuilt from scratch just to see) and in the Gui under networking I see the interface br1 and I enabled it and have it set to DHCP.. rebooted (at the request of the nano) and I see no IP/mask and no MAC address in the gui. ifconfgi shows teh following:
# ifconfig
br0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.128.164 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.128.255
inet6 fe80::dea6:32ff:fe44:28ed prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether dc:a6:32:44:28:ed txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 5930795 bytes 12987678036 (12.0 GiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 58 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 704026 bytes 41264646 (39.3 MiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
docker0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 172.17.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast 172.17.255.255
ether 02:42:85:a6:12:a6 txqueuelen 0 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
enp1s0u1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ether 00:0e:c6:64:6a:b9 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 226 bytes 10848 (10.5 KiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 2 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ether dc:a6:32:44:28:ed txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 8846940 bytes 13228208395 (12.3 GiB)
RX errors 38 dropped 38 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 705199 bytes 41343304 (39.4 MiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host>
loop txqueuelen 1000 (Local Loopback)
RX packets 113 bytes 100987 (98.6 KiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 113 bytes 100987 (98.6 KiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
virbr0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.122.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.122.255
ether 52:54:00:b0:6a:ed txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
virbr1: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 10.1.1.7 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.1.1.255
ether 52:54:00:24:d6:b1 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
wlan0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ether 12:96:4a:2c:12:4e txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
so it does not see eth1 or br1 but the Gui knows its there. in /etc/sysconfig/network scripts there was no ifcfg-eth1 so I built it based on the eth0 file.. and restarted networking. I get the foloowing;
# systemctl restart network
Job for network.service failed because the control process exited with error code. See "systemctl status network.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details.
# systemctl status network.service
Failed to get properties: Connection timed out
# journalctl -xe
Oct 21 10:44:54 myantsle network[5204]: RTNETLINK answers: File exists
Oct 21 10:44:54 myantsle network[5204]: RTNETLINK answers: File exists
Oct 21 10:44:54 myantsle network[5204]: RTNETLINK answers: File exists
Oct 21 10:44:54 myantsle network[5204]: RTNETLINK answers: File exists
Oct 21 10:44:54 myantsle network[5204]: RTNETLINK answers: File exists
Oct 21 10:44:54 myantsle network[5204]: RTNETLINK answers: File exists
Oct 21 10:44:54 myantsle systemd[1]: network.service: control process exited, co
Oct 21 10:44:54 myantsle systemd[1]: Failed to start LSB: Bring up/down networki
-- Subject: Unit network.service has failed
-- Defined-By: systemd
-- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
--
-- Unit network.service has failed.
--
-- The result is failed.
Oct 21 10:44:54 myantsle systemd[1]: Unit network.service entered failed state.
Oct 21 10:44:54 myantsle systemd[1]: network.service failed.
Oct 21 10:44:54 myantsle polkitd[387]: Unregistered Authentication Agent for uni
Oct 21 10:44:57 myantsle anthilld[1314]: Oct 21, 2020 10:44:57 AM user invoke
Oct 21 10:44:57 myantsle anthilld[1314]: INFO: Connect timed out, retrying...
Oct 21 10:45:42 myantsle ksmtuned[408]: /usr/sbin/ksmtuned: line 64: /sys/kernel
Oct 21 10:45:42 myantsle ksmtuned[408]: /usr/sbin/ksmtuned: line 65: /sys/kernel
Oct 21 10:45:42 myantsle ksmtuned[408]: /usr/sbin/ksmtuned: line 66: /sys/kernel
lines 2192-2214/2214 (END)
Anyone have any ideas? I relize this is based on centos 7 and have gone throught he gambit for enableing it the centos way.. but... Im nowgrasping at straws 🙂
thanks
william
Hi while:
This one below has been tested with our nano. It was recognized by edgeLinux / antMan and got new IP Address: